05-03-2020, 08:46 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-03-2020, 08:47 PM by MactoPerFuror.)
There is nothing provided enough to remove them. The only working argument is 'they are toxic sometimes'. And I agree with that, they are. But that is a simple issue that can be worked out without having to strip them of rank. It is also the only thing in this thread that evidence has been posted. We are working to address that issue.
All of the other claims however have either been debunked or are lacking the evidence to back up the claims. The issues with the baiting, well, yeah. I cannot help you if you say a slur after being dared to say a slur, you still said it. The context of how you said it matters and frankly in that context, it was used as a slur so... it cannot be helped. Avoid saying slurs, it is not difficult. Treat people as equals. Nobody said it because they didn't want too in that incident.
And this is a staff complaint, it has rules and ways for it to be handled. Working on facts and evidence over opinions helps keep things clear and able to move forward in a positive fashion. Clearly, the only mistake here is allowing this post to evade rule 4. If you can make a proper staff complaint against ratty with a precise and clear focus on real wrongdoings then perceived notions, opinions of others and what have you, then we have a real case to work with. Instead this is just another piece for you to rant about your bias against an individual without even caring about a positive result. You want blood, but you will not have it.
All of the other claims however have either been debunked or are lacking the evidence to back up the claims. The issues with the baiting, well, yeah. I cannot help you if you say a slur after being dared to say a slur, you still said it. The context of how you said it matters and frankly in that context, it was used as a slur so... it cannot be helped. Avoid saying slurs, it is not difficult. Treat people as equals. Nobody said it because they didn't want too in that incident.
And this is a staff complaint, it has rules and ways for it to be handled. Working on facts and evidence over opinions helps keep things clear and able to move forward in a positive fashion. Clearly, the only mistake here is allowing this post to evade rule 4. If you can make a proper staff complaint against ratty with a precise and clear focus on real wrongdoings then perceived notions, opinions of others and what have you, then we have a real case to work with. Instead this is just another piece for you to rant about your bias against an individual without even caring about a positive result. You want blood, but you will not have it.
